Fejo v northern territory 1998 195 clr 96
WebFejo v Northern Territory (1998) 195 CLR 96. March 13, 2024 March 10, 2024 casesummaries. Facts On 6 December 1996, the Larrakia people, a community or group of Aboriginal Australians whose traditional lands encompass lands and waters around Darwin and the Cox Peninsula in the Northern Territory, lodged an application in the Federal … WebSep 10, 1998 · Fejo & Anor v Northern Territory of Australia & Anor Aboriginals - Native title to land - Extinguishment - Whether grant of fee simple extinguishes native title - …
Fejo v northern territory 1998 195 clr 96
Did you know?
Web[No. 2] (1992) 175 CLR 1; WA v Cth (the Native Title Act case) (1995) 183 CLR 373 at 422; Wik Peoples v Queensland (1996) 187 CLR 1 referred to; North Ganalanja Aboriginal … WebOklahoma.gov Home
WebFejo v Northern Territory [1998] HCA 58; (1998) 195 CLR 96. Held that a grant of land in fee simple extinguished underlying native title because the two sets of rights were inconsistent with each other. Native Title is completely extinguished by the grant of a freehold estate. WebNov 8, 2005 · Attachment/s. fejo-v-northern-territory_0.pdf (pdf, 22.55 KB) The Larrakia people, whose country includes areas in and around Darwin, Palmerston and Litchfield in the Northern Territory, sought a declaration of native title in the Federal Court. The native title claim was over an area of land which was once granted in fee simple but had later ...
WebFejo v Northern Territory (1998) 195 CLR 96 Griffin Coal Mining Co v Nyungar People (2005) 196 FLR 319 Gulliver Productions Pty Ltd v Western Desert Lands Aboriginal Corporation WebFejo v Northern Territory (1998) 195 CLR 96 (HCA Gleeson CJ, Gaudron, McHugh, Gummow, Kirby, Hayne and Callinan JJ) Held unanimously that native title was extinguished by a freehold grant of fee simple. Also confirmed that the extinguishment is permanent, rather than being a matter of mere suspension of native title.
Web5 Fejo v Northern Territory (1998) 195 CLR 96, 130. 6 The relevance of whether a colony was regarded as ceded, conquered or settled, to the recognition of Indigenous rights in land is discussed in Ch 2. 7 In Australia, and overseas, Indigenous peoples have entered into agreements which may recognise native
WebFarah Constructions Pty Ltd v Say-Dee Pty Ltd (2007) 236 ALR 209; Fejo v Northern Territory (1998) 195 CLR 96; Frazer v Walker (1967) 1 AC 569; Gibbs v Messer [1891] AC 248; Heid v Reliance Finance (1983) 154 CLR 326; J A Pye (Oxford) Ltd v Graham [2003] A C 419; Jared v Clements [1902] 2 Ch D 399; michelle shain greenville scmichelle sewsWebSep 1, 2009 · For general principle see Potter v Minahan (1908) 7 CLR 277 at 304; Baker v Campbell (1983) 153 CLR 52, 96–7, 116–17, 123. ... Fejo v Northern Territory of Australia (1998) 195 CLR 96; Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) ss 15 and 229. Google Scholar. 33. how to check battery on iwatch 7WebFejo v Northern Territory (1998) 195 CLR 96: 177-178 Felton v Mulligan (1971) 124 CLR 367: 128 Fencott v Muller (1983) 152 CLR 570: 109, 117, 128 Filippou v The Queen (2015) 256 CLR 47: 149, 151-152 Firebird Global Master Fund … michelle sepetyWebMay 28, 2015 · Wik Peoples v Queensland (1996) 187 CLR 1, 182. [3] A form of native title has been recognised in many former British colonies, eg South Africa and Malaysia. [4] … how to check battery on jbl flip 5WebPeoples v Queensland (1996) 187 CLR 1 at 84; Fejo v Northern Territory (1998) 195 CLR 96 at 126-7, 151. 12. This Court has no legal authority to override those decisions, nor to … how to check battery on kindle fireWebFejo v Northern Territory (1998) 195 CLR 96: 176 G v L (1990) 2 VanLR 486: 222 Guadalcanal Provincial Assembly v Speaker ... Kartinyeri v Commonwealth (1998) 195 CLR 337: 18-19, 108-109, 112, 114, 117, 120, 124-125, 130-131 Kasa v Biku (unreported, High Court, Solomon Islands, Muria CJ, 14 January michelles flowers cork