Lal babu priyadarshi vs amritpal singh
TīmeklisIn this case critique, an attempt is made to evaluate the issue of the intersection of the trademark with religious names in India in light of sec 9(2) (b) of the Trademark Act, 1999 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) and in the backdrop of Supreme court decision in Lal Babu Priyadarshini v. Amritpal Singh , wherein the court deliberated on the … TīmeklisLAL BABU PRIYADARSHI Vs. AMRITPAL SINGH. LAWS(SC)-2015-10-75 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA. Decided on October 27,2015 LAL BABU PRIYADARSHI …
Lal babu priyadarshi vs amritpal singh
Did you know?
Tīmeklis2015. gada 1. dec. · In the case of Lal Babu Priyadarshi vs. Amritpal Singh[1], the Supreme Court has considered the question of registration of names of holy books … TīmeklisFor example, a mark can not be allowed in the name of religious heads or deities on meat products, footwear, etc. In the case of Amritpal Singh v. Lal Babu Priyadarshi [2005 (30) PTC 94 (IPAB) 23 (2002) RPC 628, p.635], the Registrar refused trademark for the word ‘Ramayan.’ Firstly, it could not distinguish the products, and Secondly, it ...
Tīmeklis2024. gada 2. apr. · The Counsel for Amritpal Singh submitted that Lal Babu’s mark resembled the name of the well-known religious book ‘RAMAYAN’. This name, the … Tīmeklis2024. gada 18. maijs · Amritpal Singh v. Lal Babu Priyadarshi And Anr. 19. Court: Intellectual Property Appellate Board. Date: Jan 10, 2005. Cited By: 0. Coram: 2 ...‘RAMAYAN’ is not a distinctive mark and is devoid of any ...
TīmeklisLAL BABU PRIYADARSHI v. AMRITPAL SINGH, C.A. No.-002138-002138 / 2006, Tīmeklis1997. gada 5. dec. · Registrar of Trade Marks v.Ashok Chandra Rakhit Ltd. AIR 1955 SC 558 (SCR at p...1. Leave granted. 2. The trial court granted an interlocutory injunction in favour of the appellants in a suit filed by it for perpetual injunction to restrain the respondent...-defendant from using the expression “Super Cup” for marketing the …
Tīmeklis2015. gada 25. nov. · The apex court ruling came on an appeal filed by Bihar-based Lal Babu Priyadarshi, who had sought to trademark the word 'Ramayan' to sell incense sticks and perfumes, against the order of the ...
Tīmeklis15. fITEM NO.1A COURT NO.14 SECTION XVI (For Judgment) S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Civil Appeal No (s). 2138/2006 LAL … bishop\u0027s wine and spirits whitehouse njhttp://roundup.manupatra.in/asp/displayart.aspx?itemid=1978 bishop\\u0027s wife remakeTīmeklisThe Appellant, Lal Babu, had applied for registration of a trade mark for his product, incense sticks, with the name 'RAMAYAN' and an image of a crown. The respondent, … bishop\\u0027s windows and doors rothesayTīmeklis(a) One Shri Lal Babu Priyadarshi-the appellant herein, trading as M/s. Om Perfumery, Bakerganj, Daldali Road, Patna made an application to the Registrar of Trade Marks … bishop\\u0027s women\\u0027s soccerTīmeklis2004. gada 6. maijs · He relies on the decision of Glaxo India Limited v. CCE, Kanpur [ (Tri.) = 1995 (8) RLT 1 (CEGAT-A)]. He...free to purchases above a particular quantity. ... Lal Babu Priyadarshi v. Amritpal Singh . 4. Court: Supreme Court Of India. Date: Oct 27, 2015. Cited By: 3. Coram: 2 ...—(a) the shape of goods which results from … bishop\u0027s women\u0027s soccerTīmeklis2015. gada 12. dec. · In a recent judgment titled as “Lal Babu Priyadarshi Vs. Amritpal Singh”, the Supreme Court was posed with a legal question as to whether any … bishop\u0027s windows and doors rothesayTīmeklis2024. gada 16. jūl. · Lal Babu Priyadarshi v. Amritpal Singh . ((2015) 16 SCC 795 : AIR 2016 SC 461):— Decided on October 27, 2015 Appeal ...filed by Amritpal, while … dark to light hair at home