site stats

Martino v. denevi 1986 182 cal.app.3d 553

WebOct 28, 1993 · (See Martino v. Denevi (1986) 182 Cal.App.3d 553, 557 [7 Cal.Rptr. 354] [construing a former but similar version of section 645 to apply to objections raised in … WebKrepel(1985) 167 Cal.App.3d 677, 682; La Mesa-Springs Valley School District v. Otsuka (1962) 57 Cal.2d 309; Martino v. Denevi(1986) 182 Cal.App.3d 553]. An attorney’s fee …

MARTINO v. DENEVI (1986) FindLaw

WebOct 20, 2024 · (Martino v. Denevi (1986) 182 Cal.App.3d 553, 559.) An attorney's testimony as to the number of hours worked is sufficient evidence to support an award of attorney fees, even in the absence of detailed time records or billing statements, and there is no requirement that such records or statements be offered in evidence. WebMEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES SUPPORTING DEFENDANT NP APARTMENTS, LLC AND WILSEY MANAGEMENT, INC.S MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES (TRANSACTION ID # 56737618) FILED BY DEFENDANT NP APARTMENTS, LLC WILSEY MANAGEMENT, INC. February 09, 2015. Read court documents, court records … halter homecoming dresses 2019 https://sanda-smartpower.com

MARTINO v. DENEVI 182 Cal.App.3d 553 (1986) - Leagle

WebTable of Authorities for Martino v. Denevi, 227 Cal. Rptr. 354, 182 Cal. App. 3d 553 WebDec 27, 2012 · [Citation.] Testimony of an attorney as to the number of hours worked on a particular case is sufficient evidence to support an award of attorney fees, even in the absence of detailed time records. [Citations.]" (Martino v. Denevi (1986) 182 Cal.App.3d 553, 559.) In view of that concession, plaintiffs' arguments about the lack of detail in ... WebAug 9, 2016 · (Martino v. Denevi (1986) 182 Cal.App.3d 553, 560, 227 Cal.Rptr. 354.) Without explanation, an award may appear arbitrary, requiring remand if the appellate court is unable to discern from the record any reasonable basis for the trial court's decision. (E.g. Gorman, supra, at p. 101, 100 Cal.Rptr.3d 152 [“It is not the absence of an ... halter height adjustable monitor stand

Coastal Law Enforcement Action Networks v. California Coastal ...

Category:MARRIAGE OF ZINCHEFSKY AN No. A154284. By SIMONS

Tags:Martino v. denevi 1986 182 cal.app.3d 553

Martino v. denevi 1986 182 cal.app.3d 553

MARRIAGE OF ZINCHEFSKY AN No. A154284. By SIMONS

WebDec 6, 2024 · (Martino v. Denevi (1986) 182 Cal.App.3d 553, 559.) “Testimony of an attorney as to the number of hours worked on a particular case is sufficient evidence to support an award of attorney fees, ... (See Hadley v. Krepel (1985) 167 Cal.App.3d 677, 682.) “In challenging attorney fees as excessive because too many hours of work are … WebApr 26, 2024 · Denevi(1986) 182 Cal.App.3d 553, 559; accord Mardirossian & Associates., Inc. v. Ersoff(2007) 153 Cal.App.4th 257, 269.) Appellant has not shown the trial court abused its discretion with respect to the attorney fees award.

Martino v. denevi 1986 182 cal.app.3d 553

Did you know?

WebDenevi (1986) 182 Cal. App. 3d 553, 557 [ 227 Cal. Rptr. 354 ]; see Code Civ. Proc., § 645.) As Rubin concedes, he never objected to the referee's report or moved to set the report aside on grounds paragraph six did not apply. Web[4] To enable the trial court to determine whether attorney fees should be awarded and in what amount, an attorney should present "(1) evidence, documentary and oral, of the …

WebCalifornia Court of Appeal. Filed: June 18th, 1986 Precedential Status: Precedential Citations: 182 Cal. App. 3d 553, 227 Cal. Rptr. 354 Docket Number: A030715 Author: … WebMartino v. Denevi (1986) 182 Cal.App.3d 553, 559.) 2. The court is then entitled to make its own evaluation of the reasonable worth of the work done in light of the nature of the case and the credibility of counsel’s declaration, unsubstantiatedby time . records and billing statements. (See Weber v. Langholz (1995) 39 Cal.App.4th 1578, 1587; see

WebDenevi (1986) 182 Cal.App.3d 553, 558.) The notice of motion does not provide notice of this Court’s tentative ruling system as required by Local Rule 11.2(b). WebJun 18, 1986 · 182 Cal.App.3d 553 (1986) 227 Cal. Rptr. 354 L. ANTHONY MARTINO, Plaintiff, Cross-defendant and Appellant, v. PIETRO G. DENEVI, Defendant, Cross …

WebJun 28, 1994 · Denevi (1986) 182 Cal.App.3d 553, 557, 227 Cal.Rptr. 354, fn. omitted, emphasis added.) The Martino court, in explaining section 645, did not indicate a 10–day limit to file written objections exists. Neither did the court in Salka v.

Web(1 Witkin, Cal. Procedure (3d ed. 1985) § 165, p. 192; Hensley v. Eckerhart (1983) 461 U.S. 424, 433, 437 [ 76 L.Ed.2d 40, 50, 53, 103 S.Ct. 1933 ]; see Los Angeles v. halter hillside apartments menifee caWebPietro G. DENEVI, Defendant, Cross-complainant and Respondent. A030715. Decided: June 18, 1986 Steven H. Bovarnick, Robert E. Hunter, Hunter & Bovarnick, San … burmatex tandemWebNov 9, 2024 · Denevi (1986) 182 Cal.App.3d 553, 559.) Testimony of an attorney as to the number of hours worked on a particular case is sufficient evidence to support an award … burmatex origin musselWebThe following excerpt is from Padilla v. McClellan, 113 Cal.Rptr.2d 680, 93 Cal.App.4th 1100 (Cal. App. 2001): ... (Martino v. Denevi (1986) 182 Cal.App.3d 553, 558-559, 227 [93 Cal.App.4th 1107] "The most advanced legal research software ever built." Try it today free of charge! The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable ... halter homecoming dressesWebJun 18, 1986 · The papers supporting the motion must set forth the evidence which the referee allegedly rejected or overlooked (see Spadoni v. Maggenti (1932) 121 Cal.App. 147, 160 [8 P.2d 874]; Hoeft v. Hotchkiss (1926) 76 Cal.App. 670, 671 [245 P. 458]), and written notice must be provided to the adverse party no later than 15 days before the motion will … halter homes of daytonWebIn Martino v. Denevi (1986) 182 Cal.App.3d 553, 227 Cal.Rptr. 354, the trial court ordered a reference under section 639 and appointed an accountant as a special referee to review … burmatex rainfallhalter hood collar leash public