site stats

Tirath singh v. bachittar singh

WebAmrit Kaur Tewari (September 5, 1938 – January 13, 2024) was an Indian dental physician and a former Dean of the Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh. She also served as Head, Oral Health Sciences Centre, PGI. She was the daughter of Sardar Tirath Singh Gurum who was the minister in the Erstwhile PEPSU.. … WebTirath Singh Vs. Bachittar Singh & Ors [1955] INSC 38 (15 September 1955) 1955 Latest Caselaw 38 SC Citation : 1955 Latest Caselaw 38 SC Judgement Date : 15 Sep 1955 …

Tirath Singh Narain Singh v. Bachitar Singh Mit Singh And Ors.

WebIt is to be noted that in a case which went up before the Supreme Court and which is Tirath Singh v. Bachittar Singh, the certificate under article 133(1)(c) of the Constitution was granted by the High Court in respect of its judgment in relation to a proceeding which came up before the High Court from an Election Tribunal in exercise of its ... Web“17. It is true there is a principle of interpretation of statutes that the plain or grammatical construction which leads to injustice or absurdity is to be avoided (see Venkatarama Iyer, J. in Tirath Singh v. Bachittar Singh 1955 2 SCR 457 (AIR at p. 855). But that principle can be applied only if ‘the language admits of an interpretation ... maple bear sinop cnpj https://sanda-smartpower.com

Golden rule of interpretation and mischief rule of interpretation Law

WebDec 17, 2014 · In Tirath Singh v. Bachitter Singh the appellant argued that it was obligatory under Section 99 (1) (a) of the Representation of the Peoples Act, 1951 for the tribunal to record names of all persons who had been guilty of corrupt practices including parties and non-parties to the petition and that under the proviso, notice should be given to ... Web(Tirath Singh v. Bachittar Singh, A.I.R. 1955 S.C. 830 Rule of Harmonious Construction It is the responsibility of the Courts to avoid “a head-on clash” between two sections of the same Act, “whenever it is possible to do so, to construct provisions which appear to conflict so that they harmonize” (Raj Krishna v. Webpublic health and not – broadcasting (G. Chawla v. State of Rajasthan, AIR 1959 SC 544). Answer 1(c) According to Section 2(1) (b) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, … maple bear sinop cep

Bachittar Singh - General Manager - Sharma Management Inc

Category:N.C. MOOKERJEE AND CO. v. UNION OF INDIA - 1963-LL-0214

Tags:Tirath singh v. bachittar singh

Tirath singh v. bachittar singh

Commercial Taxes Officer vs M/S Bhagat Singh on 21 January, 2024

WebTirath Singh Narain Singh v. Bachitar Singh Mit Singh And Ors. Punjab & Haryana High Court Judgment Law CaseMine. Get free access to the complete judgment in Tirath … WebThe first respondent who is one of the electors in the Constituency filed the petition out of which the present appeal arises, for setting aside the election on the grounds, inter alia, …

Tirath singh v. bachittar singh

Did you know?

WebTirath Singh v. Bachittar Singh And Others Venkatarama Ayyar, J.— The appellant was a candidate for election to the Legislative Assembly of the State of PEPSU from the Dhuri … Web[476 D-E] Tirath Singh v. Bachittar Singh, [1955] 2 S.C.R. 457, referred to. CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Criminal Appeal No. 97 of 1964. Appeal by special leave from …

WebMar 30, 2024 · Bachittar Singh (1955). In this case, the Court held that the provisions of impugned Section 99 of Representation of People’s Act, 1951, must be interpreted by …

WebTirath Singh v/s Bachittar Singh and Others Civil Appeal No. 21 of 1955 Decided On, 15 September 1955. At, Supreme ... before they are named.Reliance was also placed by the … WebTirath Singh vs Bachittar Singh And Others on 15 September, 1955 Showing the contexts in which section 100 appears in the document Change context size Current 465 viso.

WebTirath Singh vs Bachittar Singh And Others on 15 September, 1955. Article 124 in The Constitution Of India 1949. Section 16 in The Representation of the People Act, 1951 ... in between Tirath Singh v. Bachittar Singh has laid down that - "Where the language of a statute, in its ordinary meaning and grammatical construction, leads to a manifest ...

WebAmrik Singh Vs. The State of Pepsu [1955] INSC 9 (28 February 1955) Judgement Date : 28 Feb 1955 Citation : 1955 Latest Caselaw 9 SC Government of India Act, 1935 Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) IPC Section 409. Criminal breach of trust by public servant, or by banker, merchant or agent IPC Section 465. Punishment for forgery Headnote : krans cafe bishop hill ilWebSep 28, 2004 · Tirath Singh v. Bachittar Singh And Others 2 Court: Supreme Court Of India Date: Sep 15, 1955 Cited By: 204 Coram: 3 ...proviso contemplates notice only to persons who are not parties to the petition. 6. maple bear sorrisoWebAug 7, 2024 · There was a dispute regarding the issuance of the notice under section 99 of the Representation of People’s Act, 1951, with reference to corrupt activities involved in the election in the case of Tirath Singh v. Bachittar Singh. According to the rule, the notice must be sent simultaneously to everyone who has signed the election petition as a ... maple bear south asiaWeb(October 25, 1948), provides for an appeal to a Division Bench against a judgment, decree or order of one Judge of the High Court, on a certificate granted by the Judge or in his absence by the Chief Justice, except where the judgment, decree or order is made in exercise of criminal appellate jurisdiction or in exercise of the powers of … kranshi curaçao phone numberWebThe view taken by the Gujarat High Court in (1981) 132 ITR 159 (Guj) (supra) has been upheld by the Supreme Court in case of CIT v. Madhukant M. Mehta (2001) 247 ITR 805 (SC). 10. In CIT v. J.H. Gotla (supra), the fact of the case are that assessee has transferred some part of the machinery of his business to wife and minor children. Wife has ... maple bear sofiaWebOct 17, 2024 · Tirath Singh v. Bachittar Singh RESEARCH PAPERS Shrikant P Thombre, General principles of statutory interpretation with special reference to golden rule & … maple bear siteWebNov 5, 2024 · Pritipal Singh V. Union Of India There was the criminal case was against the defendant, the charge sheet was filed as per the violations and provisions under the ‘Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substance Act, 1985’ and the interpretation of words was in question. The court emphasized the literal rule of interpretation. kran shower jopex